Snowy River Key to New Power This vast project will mean a juggling of Alpine
streams to make the Snowy River key to new power. by J. Bennetts. 22 January 1949 The Advertiser (Adelaide) |
River diversions recommended by a Commonwealth-Victorian-New
South Wales committee in the latest composite plan for the Snowy River hydro-electric
power project are: - One-third of the Snowy head-waters
(about 300,000 acre ft. a year) to be diverted to the Tumut,
tributary of the Murrumbidgee. The waters of the Tooma, tributary of
the Murray, also to be diverted to the Tumut; this will rob the
Murray of water, but to compensate. Another one-third of Snowy headwaters
to be diverted, this time to the Upper Murray. Some water from the Upper Murrumbidgee
to be diverted into the tributary Tumut. It will, of course, flow
back to the Murrumbidgee again, but will produce more power in
the fast flowing Tumut. So far, this accounts for two thirds
of the Snowy head waters. The Upper Murray breaks even; the Murrumbidgee,
through its tributary, the Tumut, gains about 600,000 acre feet a
year. The point still not settled is
what should be done with the remaining third of the Snowy
headwaters. The water could be diverted
directly to the Upper Murray, producing cheap power and giving the Murray
Valley increased irrigation; or it could be sent to the Murrumbidgee,
producing less power at greater cost, but increasing Murrumbidgee Valley
irrigation still more. The Joint committee is now awaiting
the opinions of State authorities. It does not expect to make a
final recommendation until April. Why
all this juggling with alpine streams? Why divert water to the Murray,
only to rob the Murray of the same amount of water by diverting its
tributary, the Tooma? The reason is that this high altitude
juggling, combined with careful sighting of dams, will ensure that
there is a constant, controlled flow of water through from 15 to 20
hydro-electric power stations which are to be built. All the year round, summer or
winter, sunshine or snow, there will be water in the alpine dams to gush down
the races, spin the turbines and generate electric power. This is the topographical background
to the Snowy project: The Murray, its tributary the Tooma, the
Murrumbidgee and its tributary the Tumut, and
the Snowy itself all are fed by the melting snows on the Australian
Alps. The Murray, the Murrumbidgee and their
tributaries flow generally westward, converging eventually in the Murray
proper and running to the sea through the south-west corner of
South Australia. The Snowy flows southward through
eastern Victoria, emptying into the Tasman. The experts have always agreed
that there is little to be lost and much to be gained from the
inland diversion of the Snowy headwaters. It would rob the lower reaches of
the Snowy of only 46 p.c. of their total volume of water. The remaining 54 p.c,
draining in from eastern Victorian catchments, is sufficient for most
purposes. The
question was - how to divert the headwaters? New South Wales wanted diversion
into the Murrumbidgee; Victoria diversion to the Murray. With a dead- lock threatening,
the Commonwealth-States Committee produced the composite plans now
under consideration. In a recent broadcast to the nation,
the Prime Minister (Mr. Chifley) said that, if adopted, the plan
would result in the production of nearly 1,750,000 kilowatts of power,
at half the cost of coal-generated power. This would be 600,000 kilowatts more
than the present combined consumption of Victoria and New South Wales. The plan envisages construction of 15
to 20 power stations, seven major dams, 80 to 100 miles of
tunnelling through the Alps, and 500 miles of water race lines. The power stations, mostly underground,
will be fairly well protected from bombing and will need only a
small amount of labour to run them. Mr. Chifley said the project would
cost between £166m and £185m and would not be completed for a
generation. No-one yet has decided who will
provide the money, but presumably the Commonwealth and the benefiting States
will share in proportion to the power and irrigation they receive. Probably the work will be done by
existing organisations - the Victorian State Electricity Commission and
the State Rivers and Water Supply Commission: the New South Wales Public
Works Department and the Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission;
and the Commonwealth Department of Works and Housing. Victoria and New South Wales will
benefit most, but South Australia could expect to benefit from the
additional 900.000 acre-feet of water entering the Murrumbidgee-Murray
system each year. Not all of this water would be
used be- fore it reached the South Australian border. South Australia would benefit too from
the better regulation of Murray water, which will result from the
installation of new dams. Australia's industrial core, the eastern
area between Melbourne in the south, and Brisbane in the north, supplied with
cheap power from one near bombproof hydro-electric system - that is
a plan which should materialise for the next generation of
Australians, when the Snowy project is completed. |